B. K. Gupta & Rajendra Sinh
Page No.: 11463 - 11468
R. P. Meena & Sajjan Kumar
Page No.: 11469 - 11476
Chetan Trivedi & Dudhatra Purnanshu Shamjibhai
Page No.: 11477 - 11484
Prof. S. I. Kumbhar & Chandrasen M Jagtap
Page No.: 11485 - 11494
Yugendar Nathi
Page No.: 11495 - 11507
Sujata Acharya
Page No.: 11508 - 11514
Shubhashree Dash
Page No.: 11515 - 11527
Sajjan Thool & Manisha Gulabrao Patil
Page No.: 11528 - 11534
Dinesh Pratap Tomar
Page No.: 11535 - 11542
Uma Sharma & Suraksha Bansal
Page No.: 11543 - 11551
Shail Dhaka
Page No.: 11552 - 11557
Pratibha Yadav
Page No.: 11558 - 11562
Anita Rani
Page No.: 11563 - 11566
Krishan Kant & Anju Rani
Page No.: 11567 - 11570
Prof. S. I. Kumbhar & Shivaraj. R. Sonawane
Page No.: 11571 - 11577
Abhishek Dubey & Nita Sinh
Page No.: 11578 - 11582
Noufal Farook P. & Prof. C. Naseema
Page No.: 11583 - 11592
Akhilesh Kumar Dixit
Page No.: 11593 - 11607
Parul Singh & Rahul Sharma
Page No.: 11608 - 11614
Ms. Preetha George
Page No.: 11615 - 11620
D. S. Yadav & Satnam Singh
Page No.: 11621 - 11630
Sunanda Siddhartha Roy
Page No.: 11631 - 11637
Charudatta Achyut Gandhe
Page No.: 11638 - 11645
Phong Son Pham
Page No.: 11646 - 11652
Nguyen Thi Suong
Page No.: 11653 - 11656
Aruna Anchal & Poonam Rani
Page No.: 11657 - 11663
Neelu Verma
Page No.: 11664 - 11672
Mithilesh Kumar & Chhabinath Yadav
Page No.: 11673 - 11680
Kamaljit Kaur & Md. Saifur Rahman
Page No.: 11681 - 11691
M. Kishor
Page No.: 11681 - 11693
Mr. Bhadab Hembram
Page No.: 11694 - 11704
L. Srishyla.
Page No.: 11705 - 11716
Khan Tanveer Habeeb
Page No.: 11717 - 11723
Asema Siddiqui & (Shri) Sarat Chandra Patra
Page No.: 11724 - 11731
Nikam Subhash Eknath & Suhas S. Pathak
Page No.: 11732 - 11735
Sharda Nagnath Shelke & S. S. Pathak
Page No.: 11736 - 11738
Devendra Singh Sindhu
Page No.: 11739 - 11747
Rekha Nariwal
Page No.: 11748 - 11753
Ravindra Baburao Jadhav
Page No.: 11754 - 11757
Sarika Gautam Bahirat
Page No.: 11758 - 11764
Sharad Hari Vishwasrao
Page No.: 11758 - 11762
Jagdish Babulal Rathod
Page No.: 11763 - 11767
Dr.Balbir Singh Jamwal
Page No.: 11768 - 11778
Shakera Parveen
Recived Date: 2021-09-25 | Accepted Date: 2021-09-30 | Published Date: 2021-10-01
Page No.: 11779 - 11782
After a long gap of 34 years NEP-2020 came up with some important radical changes in the education system. The New problems which are emerging in day-to-day life and in education system cannot be solved with old policies. With changing times, it becomes compulsory to crop new policies and then there arises a new thought process and reflection. Investigator has thrown light on 15.9 clause under Teacher Education Caption of the New Education Policy 2020.15.9 clause is related to Ph.D entrants who took admission. The investigator wanted to know the perceptions of Ph.D scholars towards doctoral Training Period in the light of NEP2020.The objective of the investigator is to find out the perceptions of Ph.D scholars towards the Doctoral Training Period as mentioned in the policy NEP 2020.Institutional level survey was conducted on Ph.D Scholars of Teacher Education institution of MANUU. Tool was administered on them and data was collected using likert five-point scale. The findings of the study revealed that 100% Ph.D scholars are interested to involve in pedagogic practices and academic writing activities.
Mrs. Rekha G. Jadhawar, Prof. Megha Uplane & Dr. Geeta Shinde
Recived Date: 2021-09-25 | Accepted Date: 2021-09-30 | Published Date: 2021-10-01
Page No.: 11783 - 11793
The National Education Policy 2020 is the first education policy of the 21st century and aims to address the many growing developmental imperatives of our country. The National Education Policy lays particular emphasis on the development of the creative potential of each individual. Recognizing the ‘power of teacher’ NEP 2020 has put in place systemic reforms that would help ‘teaching’ emerge as an attractive profession of choice for bright and talented young minds.
The present study aims at analyzing the opinion of teacher trainees on National Education Policy 2020 in India. A descriptive survey method was used for study. The purposive sampling technique was used to select the sample for study. A questionnaire based on five-point rating scale was given through google forms prepared by the researcher to recognize the opinion of the trainee teacher about the National Education Policy 2020.
The results reveals that the opinion of the teacher trainees on NEP 2020 is found significantly favorable. The newly framed policy is different from the previous policies and it has fulfilled the most of the required criteria of the educational system. The teacher trainees believed that NEP 2020 would really bring some changes in education system in India. The use of mother tongue in lower classes will retain students’ interest more than English medium school. Further they also believed that Information Communication Technology (ICT) is needed to enhance our education system. The teaching task will become more motivating to the teachers for effective and purposeful teaching. Finally, they opined that NEP 2020 will successfully enhance the quality of school education. Implementing new educational policy in the Indian educational system will make a drastic change and provide a high-quality education to all. Then it will also produce an all-round development of the future citizens to the nation.
Sisir Das
Recived Date: 2021-09-25 | Accepted Date: 2021-09-30 | Published Date: 2021-10-01
Page No.: 11794 - 11802
The Shishu Shiksha Karmasuchi (SSK) and Madhyamik Shiksha Karmasuchi (MSK) initiatives in West Bengal has been instrumental in advancing the goal of universal primary education, particularly in underprivileged and remote areas. The SSK & MSK programs ware established to provide accessible, quality education to children in habitations lacking formal schools. The SSK was for the primary section from class I to Class IV and MSK is for students belongs to the Upper primary section from class V to VII level. Through community involvement and localized educational strategies, the program has effectively increased enrollment rates, reduced dropout rates, and bridged educational gaps among marginalized populations. The study highlights the development of Shishu Shiksha Kendras (SSK) and Madhyamik Shiksha Kendras (MSK) in West Bengal, revealing significant infrastructural disparities between districts.
K. Nagalakshmi & Prof. E. Sudha Rani
Recived Date: 2021-09-25 | Accepted Date: 2021-09-30 | Published Date: 2021-10-01
Page No.: 11803 - 11811
Socio-political movements are collective actions aimed at bringing about social or political change. They can take many forms, including protests, advocacy campaigns, and grassroots organizing. Socio-political movements play a crucial role in shaping societies and addressing inequalities. Their evolution reflects changing societal values and the ongoing struggle for justice and equality. Throughout history, these movements have been instrumental in shaping societies, challenging injustices, and fostering progress. They arise in response to perceived grievances, inequalities, or injustices, and mobilize individuals around shared goals. This essay explores the nature, significance, and impact of socio-political movements, illustrating their role as catalysts for change. Mahabubnagar, located in the Indian state of Telangana, has a rich history of socio-political movements that reflect the region's struggles for social justice, economic development, and political representation. These movements have played a significant role in shaping the district's socio-economic landscape. Present paper explores key socio-political movements in Mahabubnagar, their objectives, impacts, and the broader context of social change in the region.