Esther Macedo Chopra
Page No.: 11108 - 11121
Mikki Kumari
Page No.: 11122 - 11126
Jayakumar. K.
Page No.: 11127 - 11131
Brijesh Pandey
Page No.: 11127 - 11131
Hadley Quadros & Vatika Sibal
Page No.: 11127 - 11131
Gajanan Gulhane
Page No.: 11139 - 11145
Karun Mehta & Pankhuri Saxena
Page No.: 11146 - 11151
Priyanka Kumari
Page No.: 11152 - 11160
Poonam Rani
Page No.: 11161 - 11166
Akhilesh Yadav
Page No.: 11168 - 11174
Archana Sharma
Page No.: 11175 - 11188
Ashwini Ashtekar
Page No.: 11189 - 11194
Suhaskumar Ruparo Patil & D. T. Gaupale
Page No.: 11195 - 11206
Paramata Bhuvanes Wari
Page No.: 11207 - 11217
Ashok Kumar Verma
Page No.: 11218 - 11222
Ashok Kumar Verma
Page No.: 11223 - 11226
Ananya Singh
Page No.: 11227 - 11229
Veerendra Kumar Wali S.
Page No.: 11230 - 11236
Mrs. Rekha G. Jadhawar, Prof. Megha Uplane & Dr. Geeta Shinde
Recived Date: 2021-05-25 | Accepted Date: 2021-05-30 | Published Date: 2021-06-01
Page No.: 11237 - 11248
This research paper conducts a comprehensive comparative study on the effectiveness of traditional versus alternative assessment methods within in-service teacher education programs. Through a detailed analysis of empirical studies, the paper explores how traditional assessments—characterized by standardized testing and summative evaluations—contrast with alternative assessments—such as portfolios, self-assessments, and formative feedback—in terms of their impact on teacher competencies, perceptions, and professional development. The findings indicate that alternative assessment methods often offer a more nuanced and effective approach to evaluating and enhancing teacher performance. By providing continuous feedback and fostering reflective practices, alternative assessments align more closely with contemporary educational needs. This study underscores the importance of integrating diverse assessment approaches to optimize teacher education outcomes and support continuous professional growth.