Neha Jain
Page No.: 322 - 328
Zhiwei Chen & Sanjeev Sonawane
Page No.: 344 - 351
Zhiwei Chen & Sanjeev Sonawane
Page No.: 352 - 359
Anoop Kumar Singh & Rupesh Kumar Gupta
Page No.: 360 - 369
Vini Sebastian
Page No.: 370 - 374
Sanjay Kumar Singh & J.K.Singh
Page No.: 400 - 407
M.Vijayakumar
Page No.: 408 - 419
Anamika
Page No.: 420 - 431
Rege K & Aranjo. P
Page No.: 432 - 445
Ajay Kumar Chaudhary & Bharat Dadhich
Page No.: 446 - 457
Seema Sharma
Page No.: 458 - 464
Shouvik Roy
Page No.: 465 - 470
Hariom Verma
Page No.: 471 - 476
Sudhir Pandurang More
Page No.: 477 - 490
Pandey Gayatri & Pandey vivek
Page No.: 491 - 498
Minakshi Biswal
Page No.: 499 - 507
Jaya Virat
Page No.: 878 - 885
Leelavatti
Page No.: 532 - 536
Ambica Saini
Page No.: 537 - 542
Mrs. Manjuri Gogoi & Sailendra Bhuyan
Page No.: 542 - 562
Mr. Vijay M.Gawas & Mr.Mahesh Velip
Page No.: 563 - 579
Sudhindra Roy & Ritendra Roy
Page No.: 580 - 591
Jagan Karade
Page No.: 592 - 606
Sangeeta N. Pawar
Page No.: 607 - 618
Subir Sen & Tuhin Kumar Samanta
Page No.: 619 - 629
N.V.Bose
Page No.: 630 - 651
Raghuveer Pinisetty
Page No.: 662 - 670
Veena A. Prakashe & Sapana S. Tayade
Page No.: 671 - 679
Ms. Anupama
Page No.: 680 - 686
C .A. Shingte
Page No.: 687 - 692
Veena Devi Trivedi
Page No.: 693 - 697
Kapil Gandhar
Page No.: 715 - 735
Dalveer Singh Kaunteya
Page No.: 736 - 744
Sawinder Arora
Page No.: 745 - 749
Uttam N. Gadhe
Page No.: 750 - 757
Dipak Chavan
Page No.: 758 - 763
Patil Anil Nimba
Page No.: 773 - 783
Surendra Singh
Page No.: 784 - 797
Radhakrishnan T.T.
Page No.: 798 - 815
Khushal Limbraj Mundhe
Page No.: 816 - 818
Dr. H N VISHWANATH
Recived Date: 2015-07-10 | Accepted Date: 2015-08-20 | Published Date: 2015-09-04
Page No.: 819 - 827
Effective Teaching and meaningful Learning in Science are the two foci of imparting productive Science education. If both are to be highly qualitative, it’s very important for the teachers and practitioners to realize and refine their understandings of curriculum transaction in Science. It is an accepted fact that effective teachers are usually not born but made through training, exposure and experience. Good Science teachers nurture their scientific knowledge and skills through constant and deliberate efforts. One of the prerequisite to be a good science teacher is to understand the process of teaching-learning science and effective classroom management in more depth.
It is indeed a sorry state of affairs that even today teaching is just transacting curriculum by way of direct explanation of the content for conceptual understanding by teachers where students are just passive recipients of information rather active producers of new knowledge. In the context of NCF 2005 and NCFTE 2009, which strongly advocate self-construction of knowledge, it is very significant to rethink about the dynamics of curricular transaction and redesign the pedagogic dimensions in the teaching of Science so as to enable students construct their own scientific knowledge, relate it to the immediate environment, reflect it in their personality and extend the same for problem solving in life and community for a better quality of life. More specifically learning of Science needs to be shifted from passive and conventional methods to active and innovative methods.
In this context one has to seriously think about how to make children active learners with an enhanced ability to construct their own scientific knowledge and become productive citizens of our country. There is an element of discovery, exploration, and inquiry in every child that probably lead him or her to a contributory individual in terms of scientist. In a nutshell each individual student is a budding scientist who is only to be pulled out. This would be possible only when teachers modify their information transferring conventional classrooms into a place where students are transformed to produce new knowledge, get their scientific skills sharpened, scientific attitude is promoted, aptitude is magnified and in total the competence levels of students are boosted up. This indeed requires a new pedagogy called Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers shall try to refine and reflect their understandings of the principles of constructivism and put conscious efforts to design a Constructivist Learning Environment (CLE) their Constructivist Classrooms.
In this context the present study finds its significance, as the researcher tries to analyze the teaching-learning process and the pedagogical dynamics of constructivist science curricular transaction when students are employing 5E model of teaching Science.
Dr. H N VISHWANATH
Recived Date: 2015-07-10 | Accepted Date: 2015-08-20 | Published Date: 2015-09-04
Page No.: 819 - 827
Effective Teaching and meaningful Learning in Science are the two foci of imparting productive Science education. If both are to be highly qualitative, it’s very important for the teachers and practitioners to realize and refine their understandings of curriculum transaction in Science. It is an accepted fact that effective teachers are usually not born but made through training, exposure and experience. Good Science teachers nurture their scientific knowledge and skills through constant and deliberate efforts. One of the prerequisite to be a good science teacher is to understand the process of teaching-learning science and effective classroom management in more depth.
It is indeed a sorry state of affairs that even today teaching is just transacting curriculum by way of direct explanation of the content for conceptual understanding by teachers where students are just passive recipients of information rather active producers of new knowledge. In the context of NCF 2005 and NCFTE 2009, which strongly advocate self-construction of knowledge, it is very significant to rethink about the dynamics of curricular transaction and redesign the pedagogic dimensions in the teaching of Science so as to enable students construct their own scientific knowledge, relate it to the immediate environment, reflect it in their personality and extend the same for problem solving in life and community for a better quality of life. More specifically learning of Science needs to be shifted from passive and conventional methods to active and innovative methods.
In this context one has to seriously think about how to make children active learners with an enhanced ability to construct their own scientific knowledge and become productive citizens of our country. There is an element of discovery, exploration, and inquiry in every child that probably lead him or her to a contributory individual in terms of scientist. In a nutshell each individual student is a budding scientist who is only to be pulled out. This would be possible only when teachers modify their information transferring conventional classrooms into a place where students are transformed to produce new knowledge, get their scientific skills sharpened, scientific attitude is promoted, aptitude is magnified and in total the competence levels of students are boosted up. This indeed requires a new pedagogy called Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers shall try to refine and reflect their understandings of the principles of constructivism and put conscious efforts to design a Constructivist Learning Environment (CLE) their Constructivist Classrooms.
In this context the present study finds its significance, as the researcher tries to analyze the teaching-learning process and the pedagogical dynamics of constructivist science curricular transaction when students are employing 5E model of teaching Science.